久久久国产一区二区_国产精品av电影_日韩精品中文字幕一区二区三区_精品一区二区三区免费毛片爱

 找回密碼
 注冊會員

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

搜索
查看: 24058|回復: 33

英文三坐標論壇的一點翻譯

[復制鏈接]
1#
發表于 2009-3-7 20:09:53 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
最近慢慢翻譯英文三坐標論壇的帖子,看看外國人特別是北美人如何看待不同的三坐標以及他們的水平,需求5 l8 m) w) w6 B* ?4 I$ [

8 Q0 ~, o1 `6 s# }4 u; @剛開始翻譯,手有點生,主要是意譯.如果寫的不明白還請眾兄弟們見諒
3 E0 k* V; A2 X6 J8 m8 K
+ J+ F; [7 v, X1 Z0 O[ 本帖最后由 吟嘯徐行 于 2009-3-7 20:19 編輯 ]

評分

參與人數 1威望 +10 收起 理由
揚天測量 + 10

查看全部評分

回復

使用道具 舉報

2#
 樓主| 發表于 2009-3-7 20:19:49 | 只看該作者
Welcome to CMM Talk
" @( x5 Q6 m( c, e/ X" w* vThe Cyberspace Community for CMM Professionals
" Y, e4 \& Z# n: ]& R/ |歡迎來到 CMM 論壇8 x  h% z# o: F3 J" ^
CMM 專業人士的網上交流論壇
) O- d3 t% P  n8 k" w. n) i) T" y- C* ]* Y& x7 g& k/ e. C
View Press Release0 h0 q) o- r6 B: k+ z9 z9 c
主要觀點
' }3 g  C) ]+ ]1 r, @& ]
0 v, ^! S+ ]! @About CMM Talk: The premier cyberspace community dedicated to the tens of thousands of CMM Programmers and Professional Users of CMM's in North America.
0 J; L3 N# z) _2 R0 f2 `& S) Z# Z- U% D有關 CMM 論壇: 北美最好的論壇,它專注服務于萬名CMM 程序師和專業使用者。  w! J& [% |3 I2 z8 a+ F

1 ~4 `: H, m5 {  V( U" @CMM Talk Mission: "To create, manage and maintain a professional independent cyberspace location for the CMM community to visit for enrichment of their own knowledge while passing on their experiences and knowledge to fellow professionals"  
9 R% m5 Q/ Z' ^- q0 C/ `CMM 論壇宗旨:創建,管理并維護一個專業,獨立的論壇.通過具有豐富經驗和知識的訪問者在此傳遞交流各自的經驗.
' z! ^" N8 s; ^) K0 R" t: ~9 M( z0 w8 b, }, m2 m4 \! z
Available Resources: : Z. C/ I6 K- A) w& J3 b
可用的資源: ' \8 i, W5 T: W
' ^+ k' k& M& T4 [9 f( K
The CMM Talk user forum is divided into the following categories:# @) f: K5 B1 \$ r6 p" V- a" B* {! s
CMM 論壇分為一下幾個區:, B8 G% d, C/ B" E
. p; c! s& f) d5 U' d  U
General - The area for all miscellaneous discussions that are not appropriate for the numerous specific forums.2 H% l' E" H0 q& G$ i9 k
大雜燴-為沒有專門劃分區而提供的一個討論區) B( g; W' e# D5 Z1 N! C* E* N
* u5 b  }) j, K; \- P1 g$ n& B
Hardware - CMM and Portable - Forums exist for users of the numerous CMM and Portable hardware brands. The intent of this forum is to discuss CMM hardware, service and associated issues and experiences.
: y! v$ ?  {2 F: ]+ r硬件- CMM 和便攜式的- 存在很多橋式和便攜式牌子分區。分區將討論 CMM 硬件、服務,與之相關的費用和經驗。
7 }+ {9 d; M( s
; M0 F; y6 Y6 {2 z, VSoftware - Forums exist for most popular CMM software packages.Forums are intended to exchange ideas, experiences, questions and relevant answers
1 a7 v  i) t& w/ ^軟件-這個分區存在主流的CMM 軟件。分區目的為交換主意,經驗, 疑問和相關的答案& S2 c5 z7 n( h% R

+ I0 s2 e8 \( J  n9 N6 ZSensors - This is the location to exchange probing information, ideas, "tips" etc from Renishaw to Zeiss and others.* J+ ]/ L$ T! {) N" ?/ S
測頭-這個分區主要是交流測頭,探針信息等.包括 Renishaw , Zeiss 和其他者。
2 q2 C' [2 O& Q% z
9 G1 n0 O: \2 s' F6 I0 wFixturing - Forums to discuss and share your part fixturing ideas, experiences, concerns and solutions.
; I; T7 ^/ T! n夾具-分區討論并且分享夾具觀點、經驗、疑問和結果
! D6 S8 b/ K3 A; b2 j5 a- t4 o0 I% r: ^# C. i. J! V
CMM Calibration - The forum to discuss CMM Calibration ideas experiences, concerns and solutions.
5 J& E, r& ?# N9 u  [CMM 校準-論壇討論 CMM 校準的經驗、疑問和結果。  r8 D1 X/ D$ c( d8 r, h# w& A
4 c( V) E9 `: q4 K: V2 J/ c
SPC and GD&T - Forums to share your issues, knowledge and experiences in the areas of SPC and GD&T.- h. H" J; s. s/ X
SPC 和 GD&T -分區分享你在在 SPC 和 GD&T中的觀點,知識和經驗
$ Q/ n- g0 X+ `+ E! m) I5 a1 A& G, M1 R' Z. ~
Code Samples - The area to share your code solutions with others and to exchange ideas to help improve your applications.
) ?- q3 A7 @7 K5 l. _; B& `8 Q語言規章-分區分享你與其他人的規則解決,同時交換觀點以利于提高應用(主要是關于dmis三坐標語言和vb/c類編程語言)* A( n2 P0 E# Z. h; E4 a

3 E! C$ }/ P9 a* F/ g4 UOperating Systems - The location to discuss various operating system experiences, problems and solutions.
# P& g+ `% I- Q5 v" T操作系統-討論各種不同的操作系統經驗、問題和解決。* d" n- f1 f9 C8 h- [0 Q

  w: Y7 |, v/ Q3 V, ?, fBuy/Sell - Surplus equipment can be listed and specific equipment needs posted.: |( O& Z6 F* P. G% A& e) Y, z
買/賣-包括出售設備和需求設備2 b& H  e# _; r
. m. v# `' c3 v9 z0 x4 [
Employment - Job vacancies can be posted along with the resume of CMM professionals seeking employment.! I7 s) `3 p7 S2 y3 x' Z
職場天地-企業工作的空缺,和專業人士尋求雇主。
6 m" k1 c% X+ i5 ~
% J" j/ t$ s0 fNews and Events - Hyperlinks to relevant CMM articles in Magazines, Trade Shows event schedule and other industry relevant links.! U. R8 }' `% U1 O9 `
新聞 -與三坐標相關的雜志,內部信息和其他部門之間的鏈接.
) U" K6 E4 n3 m' x# ]1 C$ I: o9 K8 n- n, O, Y: |, G+ H6 u
24/7 Chat - Allows instantaneous exchange of ideas and experiences in a simple chat based environment* E! W! Z+ \7 I, E" Z/ s
24/7 談天-即時交換和經驗
3#
 樓主| 發表于 2009-3-9 20:17:59 | 只看該作者
Life Expectancy of a new PH10M and a refurbished one4 @( y2 }+ S1 y$ u/ P
新的和修復后的 PH10 M 的平均壽命?
+ n5 U, T# W8 J: w# o0 `* \' n, o. T
! {0 X. L( u% v- c7 F2 a9 WWhat is it? I replaced my PH10M with a RBE 3 years ago. Now I need to replace it again. What gives?
; W* X, q: D( O3 X5 y  b什么? 我 3 年前從 RBE 更換我的 PH10 M 。 現在我需要再次更換它。 什么原因?
# ~2 I& Z1 K* K+ g0 ^4 A3 J6 a: ]
couple factors influence the life expectancy of a PH9/10 probe head.
8 t5 D% t: q" w+ {% j6 e; u; b3 Q. J- Z- b, Q6 p( O
Crashes, probe indexing frequency and the power being supplied to the controller. I have seen some PH9's last a good 10 years+ and others go 3 years because they get abused. Are you sure it's the probe head that is buggered and not the internal head cable in your machine?# e) q" S( M  A5 X

: Q% f# L  [7 `: U4 I+ i7 }
1 W  t* x2 E* M2 Y4 p0 {8 Y" U/ H一些因素影響 PH9/ph10 測頭的平均壽命。
8 B  d# O, Z) d# m& Q8 q/ {) R) j) N3 C
撞擊,使用頻率和測量時力度。 我曾經見到一些 PH9 正常工作10 多年,而另外一些不足3年因為他們沒有被正確使用你確定它是測頭故障而不是機器內部的電纜?
; s8 K# E0 }! n: y7 x2 ?9 R& B6 q$ w* D1 ?# g6 s9 j1 N/ G

' K/ t6 t( p4 eYes, it's the head. I took the head off the column, checked all my connections. What was happening, at 90,0, while measuring as point in the -Y direction, the head would unseat. At first I thought it was the TP200 or module. I put in another TP200 and module, and it unseated again at 90,0. This machine has been running roughly 18 hours a day measuring the same part. It has not seen a crash ever (to the best of my knowledge).
* O4 X. C" P7 `. B: H
4 G) p  F2 a; h  Y$ JJust got an RBE this morning. It now works as it should.
2 M. a1 l* N5 m0 J' f( f3 F
7 D. n' a2 T% {! O# t$ s! v+ P- u是的,是測頭。 我從立柱上拆掉了測頭,檢查我所有的連接。 故障狀態是:在 90,0角度時, 在-Y方向測量點的時候,測頭不能抬起。 起先,我認為故障的是TP200 或模塊。我換上另外的TP200 和模塊,在 90,0角度時,它同樣不能就位. 這部機器一天大概18小時測量相同的零件。 它還不有發生一次的猛烈撞擊。(據我說知)1 z4 D. j+ ~! \2 @- f
! w" [( a" ~5 [& Z0 W
僅僅是今天早晨換了一個測頭從RBE.它現在正常工作。
$ P, _4 W0 A+ [: c2 [  T
6 S; h! ~9 ?8 s1 N8 V% j7 D2 @[ 本帖最后由 吟嘯徐行 于 2009-3-9 20:19 編輯 ]
4#
 樓主| 發表于 2009-3-9 21:37:03 | 只看該作者
從測頭這塊開始翻譯,爭取每天翻譯一點........6 i+ A2 X) M  f, }& ]% B9 J( p

+ s# P. Q# y  U: G9 h2 l9 n: p$ w7 s+ m( w0 d7 @
I'm looking into the Renishaw SP25. I understand this has good qualities when it comes to scanning. I do a fair amount of scanning. However, I'm not sure about the calibration cycle, and time. I'm referring to the time required to qualify a styli change, and new A-B angles.
& V& g3 s1 O: J3 x' L$ T# d+ @, z
# V2 q6 K0 s6 h0 CI'd like hear from anyone already using the SP25, on any system.
! P/ f  l. I8 |" m0 S# ]2 k" t" A0 s2 Z5 O
我正在考察 Renishaw SP25 。 我知道當掃描的時候它有很好的特征。 我要做一定量的掃描。 然而,我不能確認校準周期和時間。 我指的校準周期是探針值變化和使用新的AB角度。 1 M5 m) R1 ^8 b3 ^5 o

) c9 `! V$ Q; D, }  o我想要聽些已經使用 SP25的人意見, 不管任何系統上, S# ]8 D% o% ~5 M& [$ }# S9 j9 L
  L- T% ^, F# c& j. H
You might refer to this. It is pretty time consuming. Maybe 10-20 times longer that a traditional trigger probe?? Just a guess on that.; P% u4 R& p% z' [7 C$ p1 L+ t& L
http://pcdmisforum.com/showpost.php?p=19575&postcount=1
$ \9 M7 M5 B0 b% [; y, v4 g+ M
( b# @! R7 @& B. ^( |7 Q你可能會涉及這。時間是相當長。可能一個傳統的接觸測頭的10-20倍長?只是在那上的一個猜測。
3 ~3 C, N& j3 W/ L  Nhttp://pcdmisforum.com/showpost.php?p=19575&postcount=1   o6 b4 \- V, L  S

5 J* o4 w) m6 F) J$ x: n5 XYes the calibration of the SP25M is time consuming, about 4 mins per probe due to the fact it repeats the routine twice to determine the scanning probe factors. I am very impressed with the probes accuracy on my Mitutoyo Crysta. * j& J, a( T3 Q  B8 N/ ^
& k0 K/ i) n. a% x1 F* C% v, f/ V
是的 SP25 M 的校準是非常耗費時間的,大約 4 分鐘每一探頭角度,事實上它重復常規的兩次來確定掃描探針.在Mitutoyo Crysta 上其精度給我留下深刻的印象。, ~: w" O2 c2 X9 w7 j. S

# F% C* u4 h6 {9 {+ Z- R& II am using SP25M with Mcosmos, the accuracy is very good but the time difference is as previously suggested - 15/20 seconds per probe position touch trigger, 4:30 - 5 mins per position scanning factors.
- T+ d. ^$ {/ j* u/ J. BThe scanning times can be changed but the setting used depends on the accuracy req'd9 d2 p, J! u6 A% ^
5 M  K, |: g2 R
However,I do not find the calibration time a problem as I use the scheduler in the software to run the program lights out during sunday.3 Z: Q) c+ t1 P3 s- @
" O" O, {; |' j+ T
The cmm should be verified in accordance with the following spec'n :- 3 v( b, |: B' [# O; [

6 W/ o( d+ ~- x$ x# {) P"ISO 10360-4:2000
% V! H/ f9 U7 Z; @Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines Part 4: CMMs used in scanning measuring mode" * G) ?3 [+ v2 |' A/ ^% U
3 r4 c* t! U' W2 }9 d
我正在使用SP25M和Mcosmos(三豐軟件) ,精度非常好,但是時間不同意上面兩位:15/20倍常規接觸測頭,4-5分一個測頭角度 。掃描時間是可以改變的,但是使用設定取決于精度4 ]3 @6 T  {/ `3 {8 h

; P' |+ G& c+ E( L2 j: O, O然而,我并沒發現校準時間是一個問題,我使用軟件中的程序直到周末關燈為止。
3 v* c& \  C# t( X
) I+ X: d* G8 i0 T1 Ucmm 應該符合下列的標準
( V  g. u1 |2 c* i9 qISO 10360-4:2000
, Z) s: x/ L- v8 S: {/ R三坐標認可和校驗測試4: CMMs中使用掃描測頭”
0 }% q$ `; z# C. k% K! _! v( N7 \( }: \. n
With the latest release of the Renishaw scanning calibration DLL, Renishaw have reduced the scanning probe calibration times by 35% Using a calibration speed of 20mm/sec, it is now possible to calibrate and qualify a tip in 2 minutes.
% o% `" {2 o) w: RThe added benifits of an SP25 are probe lengths of 400mm and the capacity to collect so much more information about the part's shape as well as size.
  A: V8 u" D' E( j6 b! ~* W
! c3 Q2 m# _5 wRenishaw掃描校準最新的新聞鏈接, Renishaw在使用校準速度在20mm/sec的前提下,已經減少校準時間35%,比較可能的是校準同時通過一個角度需要2分鐘
9 ^" l1 m8 q1 F( A) `SP25 的附加桿最大為400 毫米和更多的能力收集零件外形。
- c6 G7 X+ x! f9 D/ { 4 j( B+ E+ ^" D' s
決定性的
5 W3 q6 ^! y, {  \; Q% l( HIf you are worried about the time it takes to calibrate the probes the easiest thing to do is generate a probe cal routine in MCOSMOS and run on the weekend. It's easy!
2 G- y& `/ a4 A4 h! M
6 @, s  }/ C6 t8 @5 J' p
1 e( V0 @2 }5 C. Y' j如果你擔憂校準測頭的時間,最簡單的就是在周末在MCOSMOS中調用測頭并運行.非常容易!
5#
發表于 2009-3-9 22:49:18 | 只看該作者
兄弟辛苦了,和你不一樣,我喜歡去http://www.practicalmachinist.co ... 6413&i=66568274
6#
發表于 2009-3-10 18:56:20 | 只看該作者
前輩,辛苦了~
7#
 樓主| 發表于 2009-3-11 23:18:38 | 只看該作者
does probe ball dia affects the measurent?because i have a probe with 2 mm dia and its giving 3 microns error but as i use the 6 mm ball dia probe , the error goes to 10 microns (its stem length is also bigger than the previous probe).
$ Y- G' _) o3 B+ [8 tbillabong/ S$ b% L9 `0 H) r
標準球直徑是否影響測量?因為我用2毫米直徑產生了3微米誤差.但是當我使用6毫米球形直徑探針,誤差達到了10個微米。(探針長度比先前大)
2 J$ j! \- W5 f6 m/ X. D& ~3 ]. V
, J+ h/ c9 P* FSome things to consider here." E( a3 y* Y% T' x) J4 j; o: @5 V
Every probe ball ( stylus ) has some slight deviation from the nominal size.
% D  J# U! E1 ZThere is also some pre-travel before the touch trigger probe sends the signal to the controller. How much depends on which touch trigger probe you have ( - Y2 @5 g. ~$ j3 U
& k" Z2 J2 G6 i. T* _6 P' I/ o
Renishaw TP2 , TP 20 , TP200 etc ).; E2 O6 S9 l4 x9 @7 |3 B
As long as you are calibrating them against a CALIBRATED masterball ,
  E6 W3 k8 H1 m# G! }AND you have input the CALIBRATED masterball result ( from the certificate ) 7 u! j7 }- ^9 v. c
into your measuring software, you should not have to worry about a difference
3 d  j/ V8 P9 s! lof 7 microns between styli.
9 A+ }1 G6 V. E' h- ]: w; g+ lRemembering your attempts to calibrate the whole machine with gauge blocks, , `0 R5 l" p6 ]6 y- L
I'd be surprised if you have the masterball calibrated. If you do, I stand corrected.
7 y6 ]; b, R6 U, H8 _- q; U/ l, t- n
在這里需要考慮部分因素
; O  s1 G# k) V( X& O& e2 f/ H每個實際探針與理論值都有一些微小的偏離。
. F" X: |+ x& [6 o6 f探針將觸發信號送到控制器之前,也有一些預行程。 行程的多少取決于你使用的測頭.(Renishaw TP2,TP20,TP200 及其他)
0 `; {2 C0 d, r4 v3 `. N只要你用標準器標準球來校正他們 , 8 p* D  D' Y$ l1 B
輸入標準球的值(從證書) 6 p7 r) A: }4 r/ S7 w' Z0 ^
打開你的測量軟件,你沒必要擔憂探針偏差7個微米。 2 x7 `( l+ r. {0 V0 T
記得嘗試用標準度塊校正整個的機器,   t0 c# R! l) c' {
如果你校正標準球,我將會感到驚訝。 如果你做了,我認錯。
4 ~+ l* i" U0 r8 M* f
& F# @4 O" V. GYou need to get the basics of your machine correct 1st before questioning
5 d% i7 j1 x& i9 [7 O: bany error or any accuracy issues you have. 7 C4 H7 a" }* ~  M* N
詢問之前你需要第一時間得到你的機器的偏差
2 I& r* O1 N7 b2 k+ z無論任何錯誤或任何精度偏差。
1 @2 u4 u5 ^2 w. K
, w( y8 }, a# e+ p' gYes! the diameter of the tip ball gives an error which is known as "cosine error" see attached file.
& e. _# `2 f, }0 b2 p6 l8 eI don't know what you are measuring but if you check a gauge block with tip dia. 2/6 it should NOT give you that difference in error!  r, g; r( O% J7 N' m3 R; T* m, G  k
Click here for Tip_points.pdf ( i0 N1 I* Z+ i& G

/ ~9 U; {) V7 i6 x7 P$ X是的,探針標準球給出一個誤差以"cosine error "
& [% s* `2 a/ ^我不知道你是怎么測量的,但是如果你用探針檢查一個量塊.但它不能給你偏差的不同!% q5 \; b- \: e$ {
點擊這 Tip_points.pdf + i2 H, @+ Z" j4 }8 i: O

# r/ Z6 ]: W4 v! @5 U6 WIf you're trying to check a 3D cone as a 2D dia at a certain Z level then, yes probe diameter will affect accuracy.
, y6 b0 L0 @+ d- N4 Y  R0 L3 yIf you're look at roundness of a known round item, say a ring gage, then the size of the tip doesn't matter except that larger diameters tend to not be as round as smaller diameters but this is generally a relatively small difference.
( |6 g6 F+ s9 W1 E/ ^3 q/ oThe biggest thing that affects accuracy/repeatability/tri-lobing is the length of the stylus. It's much more complicated but generally speaking, if a 1" long stylus results in .0003 of tri-lobing, a 2" long stylus will be around .0006. The same basic concept applies to articulating probe heads. The longer the distance from the fulcrum to the prope tip, the more variance you will have when indexing the probe head. There are many other factors involved but the probe
& p  q9 v/ J) a& Llength is by far the largest contributor. That is, assuming that cleanliness is under control.7 d) u5 ?* R8 v
4 Q7 @8 w7 L/ E# m0 D
如果你嘗試在其中特定z值平面內用一個2維測頭測量一個3D立體圓錐體.那么探針直徑將會影響精度。 & Y3 n' N3 n# u; K8 K3 c$ s/ q4 g6 b
如果你是檢查已知項目的圓,例如環規,那么與探針的大小是沒有關系的.除了一點小的不同,結果中較大的直徑不容易像較小的直徑一樣的圓。1 H! d# d) _: ?! j$ n8 K3 f9 Z
對精度/重復度/偏差影響的最大的是探針的長度.這是更多復雜的,但一般來說,如果這 1" 長的探針誤差為.0003偏差, 2" 長的探針將會是.0006 左右. 相同道理適用于關節臂測頭。 從支點到探針頂端的距離越長,你標定的測頭偏差越多。還牽涉許多其他的因素,但是探針長度是顯然最大的因素。 如果其他因素可控的話
8#
 樓主| 發表于 2009-3-11 23:22:22 | 只看該作者
未完待續" X0 V: \) X6 i. `$ T
9 m6 w0 g4 a, \) n# Z) V
回國際化:發展方向不同嘛,你所看論壇人氣明顯還是比較旺的
9#
發表于 2009-3-13 21:07:01 | 只看該作者
學英文 又能長知識 不錯
10#
發表于 2009-3-13 22:21:11 | 只看該作者
未完待續# L8 l7 t6 Y) e* X8 X. T

9 Y7 `8 z7 t* A3 M回國際化:發展方向不同嘛,你所看論壇人氣明顯還是比較旺的0 Z( L0 z/ |$ J, ~4 X
吟嘯徐行 發表于 2009-3-11 23:22
上次,他們請我寫一份意見建議,我把這個網址(中國機械社區0提交給他們,讓美國人看看我們的論壇是多么的強大
您需要登錄后才可以回帖 登錄 | 注冊會員

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|機械社區 ( 京ICP備10217105號-1,京ICP證050210號,浙公網安備33038202004372號 )

GMT+8, 2025-7-17 19:40 , Processed in 0.080707 second(s), 15 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表