從測頭這塊開始翻譯,爭取每天翻譯一點........3 b* g2 i! L% j/ p
+ K8 t6 O) T$ _% D7 L# d
& b M' |% |1 i# I- |. `+ v9 @& g2 C
I'm looking into the Renishaw SP25. I understand this has good qualities when it comes to scanning. I do a fair amount of scanning. However, I'm not sure about the calibration cycle, and time. I'm referring to the time required to qualify a styli change, and new A-B angles. , p6 D) F, [0 D
]5 n0 ~0 u; t/ R/ zI'd like hear from anyone already using the SP25, on any system. . [+ R+ `2 A8 V$ J5 N1 y9 g5 A
$ o1 [$ s/ S3 e4 U2 i3 J我正在考察 Renishaw SP25 。 我知道當掃描的時候它有很好的特征。 我要做一定量的掃描。 然而，我不能確認校準周期和時間。 我指的校準周期是探針值變化和使用新的AB角度。 , @) O( u l* [# V9 `
3 l& J( k( j" l- f+ C! P- b0 M我想要聽些已經使用 SP25的人意見, 不管任何系統上, q/ C j( m% f7 z
。
4 _; ` i! j, z& ~You might refer to this. It is pretty time consuming. Maybe 10-20 times longer that a traditional trigger probe?? Just a guess on that.
3 w# K8 X! \1 Jhttp://pcdmisforum.com/showpost.php?p=19575&postcount=1
) h3 o+ W' m3 B4 @$ f1 ?4 U5 V% h; t2 {( I" Y: l
你可能會涉及這。時間是相當長。可能一個傳統的接觸測頭的10-20倍長？只是在那上的一個猜測。9 Y3 N3 G6 {, D X
http://pcdmisforum.com/showpost.php?p=19575&postcount=1 0 _8 a+ [" c1 G) M7 {. S
- Z3 B! w# r. T( {, P! \
Yes the calibration of the SP25M is time consuming, about 4 mins per probe due to the fact it repeats the routine twice to determine the scanning probe factors. I am very impressed with the probes accuracy on my Mitutoyo Crysta.
, v/ ^ l6 s w5 [, X" G5 x
" S5 \/ X9 N+ y是的 SP25 M 的校準是非常耗費時間的，大約 4 分鐘每一探頭角度,事實上它重復常規的兩次來確定掃描探針.在Mitutoyo Crysta 上其精度給我留下深刻的印象。; z, j9 h: j/ o$ @2 m. r4 {
2 H/ A5 D& j' i
I am using SP25M with Mcosmos, the accuracy is very good but the time difference is as previously suggested - 15/20 seconds per probe position touch trigger, 4:30 - 5 mins per position scanning factors.
+ H' c7 g' b7 P9 S& k+ W) L6 z! r( tThe scanning times can be changed but the setting used depends on the accuracy req'd
- a' Z9 t2 o8 ~) e
) @+ p2 i& \' N! `& D7 uHowever,I do not find the calibration time a problem as I use the scheduler in the software to run the program lights out during sunday.( C- F' \+ f' S! n
) C* z% [, z, x* j
The cmm should be verified in accordance with the following spec'n :-
. O# v( p9 O' l B8 B3 m# ^
+ b% b# o* f. C) o U# ^"ISO 10360-4:2000 + N& E0 x& w1 Y
Acceptance and reverification tests for coordinate measuring machines Part 4: CMMs used in scanning measuring mode" , _; \/ r, c1 @8 o/ Z
; g( o) Y- C+ l3 K! T我正在使用SP25M和Mcosmos(三豐軟件) ，精度非常好，但是時間不同意上面兩位:15/20倍常規接觸測頭,4-5分一個測頭角度 。掃描時間是可以改變的，但是使用設定取決于精度
' W2 Z; ]' @2 n: c' X ?+ m% m" `
然而，我并沒發現校準時間是一個問題,我使用軟件中的程序直到周末關燈為止。8 x& y: O* i, p# M" a2 x8 o" A
: L L3 c: T! `2 G7 M
cmm 應該符合下列的標準
7 X5 T5 [2 V! g$ \" @% l, r' X# `ISO 10360-4:2000 ; Z; ]+ C7 f$ X" K- W# l" k
三坐標認可和校驗測試4: CMMs中使用掃描測頭” ) Q5 C: o7 H4 V9 ]
0 y" q- F {2 M- q8 jWith the latest release of the Renishaw scanning calibration DLL, Renishaw have reduced the scanning probe calibration times by 35% Using a calibration speed of 20mm/sec, it is now possible to calibrate and qualify a tip in 2 minutes.
0 s; I' P$ q0 \9 gThe added benifits of an SP25 are probe lengths of 400mm and the capacity to collect so much more information about the part's shape as well as size.
f; i( ]" y' {
2 p% F% l- s* c A3 ?5 c; S/ _Renishaw掃描校準最新的新聞鏈接， Renishaw在使用校準速度在20mm／sec的前提下,已經減少校準時間35%,比較可能的是校準同時通過一個角度需要2分鐘: l6 d# g M. f0 j' y
SP25 的附加桿最大為400 毫米和更多的能力收集零件外形。' ~) |! Q& F ~, X, T
2 x' z8 O0 L; @決定性的
: @# o) U5 K* V, W% _If you are worried about the time it takes to calibrate the probes the easiest thing to do is generate a probe cal routine in MCOSMOS and run on the weekend. It's easy!
7 n& C+ y# ?9 o2 z4 A: |! N; F# ^
7 m( Y! Y" P0 T( f; U2 ^) V) ^( s; L
如果你擔憂校準測頭的時間,最簡單的就是在周末在MCOSMOS中調用測頭并運行.非常容易！ |
發表于 2009-3-7 20:09:53
QQ好友和群
QQ空間
