本帖最后由 aysuio 于 2015-10-8 03:27 編輯
# M" ?- L& R5 l- R) E' L" `ValleyViews 發表于 2015-10-8 02:22 ![]()
( m U0 O: w: A$ n, t四海之內皆兄弟也。4 c7 C' L8 D5 N8 e
Talking about your explanation, I think that every sent ... / z6 `5 f' \8 n: } g0 q& X
大俠,多謝跟我討論這個問題。:D 小弟聯系方式已經站內信PM大俠 " R& y$ I9 F/ w; ]9 t, z" e, i
( [, r/ {% x3 t2 O! K/ e8 L, u1 pAs for the problem of line element, I still consider it as a 2D element. I may misunderstand something. I will appreciate your instruction if you can give me more explanation about it.
/ P" r) x2 B! |+ U6 r9 x+ t& L/ I4 {3 g! n' Q
I just got an idea about this problem. Did you want to tell me that the line elements measured in the actual components can be torqued or twisted, so they may have 3 dimensions? |