chase_1987 發表于 2014-8-23 18:48
只說是工程師，沒說是”機械“工程師啊，萬一說的是“挨踢”工程師，“墊棄”工程師呢？有的公司還有銷售工 ...
chase_1987 發表于 2014-8-23 18:48
只說是工程師，沒說是”機械“工程師啊，萬一說的是“挨踢”工程師，“墊棄”工程師呢？有的公司還有銷售工 ...
我很呆 發表于 2014-8-23 19:05
你怎么不感嘆下水平真低？
Working engineers are doing well, averaging almost $93,000 in annual compensation and unemployment is lower than the national average.
工作人員都做的很好，幾乎平均每年93000美元的補償和失業率低于全國平均水平。
This year’s salary survey gathered com-pensation data, as well as information on perks, from over 5,000 engineers. Overall, it painted a picture of the engi-neering profession as one where members are well paid, earning an average of almost $93,000. But the average bump in salary of 1.57% over last year shows that even engineers continue to feel the effects of an economy trying to rebound.
今年的薪酬調查收集的COM補償數據，以及對信息的好處，從超過5000個工程師。總的來說，它描繪了一幅圖片的工程專業作為一個成員是高薪，收入近93000美元的平均。但在去年的工資平均1.57%塊顯示即使工程師繼續感覺的影響，經濟正在反彈。
COMPENSATION
補償
Overall, engineers appear satisfied with their com-pensation. Almost two-thirds of the survey’s respon-dents say their companies pay them adequately. But there are always those who want more money. We asked engineers how large a pay increase it would take before they felt they were fairly paid. Almost one in 10 said it would take a 50% raise, and four out of 10 said the raise would need to be between 6 and 15%. On average, engineers indicated a 20% bump would be fair.
總的來說，工程師出現滿意的COM的補償。幾乎三分之二的調查者說他們的公司支付給他們充分的凹痕。但總有那些誰想要更多的錢。我們要求工程師如何大的加薪會在他們感到相當的報酬。幾乎有10表示將采取50%的提高，從10提高四說需要6和15%之間。平均增加20%的工程師表示，將是公平的。
Of course, compensation involves more than just take-home pay. The economy, however, seems to be taking a toll on benefits as well. For example, just 57% of engineers receive health-care ben-efits. Another benefit that was once widespread is employer-matching of 401(k) contributions. Only 54% of engineers enjoy this perk. Companies offer other retirement-oriented bennies such as stock options (10% of respondents say they have these), stock-purchasing plans (9% have them), and pen-sion plans (18% still have these). In fact, a little more than a quarter of the engineers responding said their company is not funding any part of their retirement.
當然，補償不僅僅是拿回家的薪水。然而，經濟，似乎是以福利的人數為。例如，只有57%的工程師接受醫療效益。另一個好處，曾經廣泛是雇主匹配401（k）的貢獻。只有54%的工程師們喜歡這個咖啡館。公司提供其他退休型貝尼斯如股票期權（10%的受訪者說他們有這些），股票購買計劃（9%人），和養老計劃（18%仍然有這些）。事實上，超過四分之一的工程師應對多一點說他們的公司是沒有資金的任何部分退休。
Other popular perks include time off (39%), educational programs (20%), company-paid dues for professional organizations (16%), and a company-paid phone (15%). One program that does not seem widespread among engi-neers is day care or a day-care subsidy. Only 1.3% of the respondents claim their employ-ers offer this option. However, it’s possible many respondents are not aware of benefits in this area as only 2.2% of the engineers who filled out the survey are female.
其他受歡迎的額外津貼包括休息時間（39%），教育（20%），公司支付會費的專業組織（16%），和一個公司的付費電話（15%）。一個程序，似乎并不普遍工程人員是日托或全托補貼。只有1.3%的受訪者稱他們的雇主提供這個選項。然而，這可能是很多人沒有意識到的好處在這個地區只有2.2%的工程師們填寫調查是女性。
With regards to education, companies support their engineers’ ongoing training in different ways. The two most common are sending engineers to trade shows and confer-ences, which 58% of respondents take advan-tage of, and attending seminars, which 56% have access to. But respondents noted that travel to seminars and trade shows is half of what it was five to 10.years ago. One reason: Companies apparently put more emphasis on online training, which 26% of the engineers receive. The other two most widespread train-ing practices are aid with college tuition (44%) and reimbursement for engineering textbooks (34%). Only about 4% of engineers say their employers give no assistance with training.
在教育方面，公司以不同的方式支持他們的工程師進行培訓。最常見的兩種是派遣工程師貿易展覽和授予期，58%的受調查者采取的優點，并參加研討會，其中有56%的訪問。但受訪者指出，旅游研討會和展會是什么，它是五到10前的一半。原因一：公司顯然對在線培訓更多的強調，這26%個工程師收到。其他兩個最普遍的訓練實踐，幫助大學的學費（44%）和工程教科書報銷（34%）。只有約4%的工程師說，他們的雇主不協助培訓。
JOB STATUS
工作狀態
Most of this year’s survey respondents are design engineers (60%), followed by engi-neering managers (12%), and executive/oper-ational managers (9%). Many in the “Other” category are consultants, educators, field engineers, marketing/sales, QA, or unem-ployed.
今年大多數的受訪者是設計工程師（60%），其次是工程管理人員（12%），和執行/監控管理人員（9%）。在“其他”類別的顧問，教育工作者，現場工程師多，市場/銷售，質量保證，或失業的。
The vast majority of the engineers responding work full time (78%), with about 12% self-employed, 3% contract work-ers, and almost 5% are part-timers.
的工程師應對全職工作，絕大多數（78%），約12%的個體，3%合同工人，幾乎5%都是兼職。
When we asked engineers where they put in their time, most said they spent at least 40 hr at the office. Some hard chargers (13%) responded that they’re at the office for 50 or more hours. On the other end of the scale, 12% are at the office for 20 hr or less.
當我們要求工程師在他們把他們的時間，大多數人說他們在辦公室花了至少40小時。一些艱難的充電器（13%）回答說，他們是在辦公室50小時或更多的時間。在另一端的規模，12%是20小時或不在辦公室。
The telecommuting and working-at-home movement doesn’t seem to have gotten much traction in the engineering community. Survey respondents aver-aged only 9 hr/week working at home, and most of that seems to be in addition to the 40 hr of office time per week. Only 9% of the engineers sur-veyed spend more than 25.hr at home. And a quarter of engineers say they don’t do any work at home.
遠程辦公和家庭運動不工作似乎已經在工程界得到了多少。受訪者的平均年齡只有9小時/周在家工作，最重要的，似乎除了辦公時間每周40小時。只有9%的工程師在全省花費超過25.hr在家。有四分之一的工程師說，他們不在家里做任何工作。
Many engineers seem tied to the office when it comes to work. Almost two-third of those responding said they never work outside the office or home, while another 20% indicate they work 5 hr or less outside the office or home. On average, respondents spend about 3 hr doing business “on the road.”
許多工程師都拴在辦公室工作的時候。幾乎三分之二的受訪者表示他們從來沒有工作辦公室或家外，另有20%表示他們工作5小時或更少的辦公室或家外面。平均而言，受訪者大約要花3小時做生意”的道路上。”
ENGINEERING EMPLOYMENT
工程就業
The survey also tried to get a snapshot of cor-porate hiring plans. On this front, the engineering profession seems to be doing well. About 30% of respondents say their companies will increase the number of engineering jobs; 60% say the number of engineering jobs at their companies will remain the same; and 10% feel their companies will lay off engineers in the upcoming year.
調查還試圖讓肺企業招聘計劃快照。在這方面，工程專業似乎做的很好。約30%的受訪者表示他們的公司會增加工程工作的數量；60%認為在他們公司的工程工作的數量將保持不變；10%感到他們的公司將裁員在即將到來的工程師。
When asked about their organization’s recruit-ing efforts, half said their HR departments are having no problem filling slots. The other half said their companies were struggling to find qualified candidates. When pressed to specify what types of engineers were hard to find, the top three answers were analog-circuit engineers (41%), software engineers (38%), and sy
當被問及他們的組織的招聘的努力，一半的人說他們的人力資源部門是沒有問題的填充槽。另一半的人說他們的公司都在努力尋找合格的候選人。當按下指定什么類型的工程師是很難找到的，排名前三的答案是模擬電路工程師（41%），軟件工程師（38%），和系統
技術到了一定份上 還是要有點其他技能才好高工資。舉個例子，有的人在冷軋方面搞設備 軋機了十幾年了！ 具體的工藝 沒有拿得出手的，最后還是在各種私企混設計，懂工藝又懂設備的，年薪100萬 （據說哈）。外語好也可以混高工資。chenqibin 發表于 2014-8-24 13:37
9.3萬美元，應該是工資總額，美國的稅收高，拿到手的應該只有現在的一半
咱們沒得比！！！！！！122747557 發表于 2014-8-26 12:05
在國內機械工程師真的就值那么一點錢么？
chase_1987 發表于 2014-8-23 18:48
只說是工程師，沒說是”機械“工程師啊，萬一說的是“挨踢”工程師，“墊棄”工程師呢？有的公司還有銷售工 ...
非常 發表于 2014-8-25 15:38
國外的工程師這個職稱是很嚴格的，工程師就是工程師的叫法，技術員就是技術員的叫法。有的人在名片上就會印 ...
| 歡迎光臨 機械社區 (http://www.ytsybjq.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.5 |
